|
|
On 3/31/06, Ingo Oeser <netdev@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Fair, but wouldn't it be better to have the association per client.
> >
> > Maybe leave the one as a summary and have a dir per client with
> > similar stats that are for each client and add a per channel summary
> > at the top level as well.
> Such level of detail really belongs to debugging, IMHO.
[snip]
If we implemented more stats then yes debugfs sounds like it might be
the way to go.
> BTW: What is the actual frequency, at which such counters
> will be incremented?
Currently the code updates these variables (kept per cpu) every time a
copy is queued. See include/linux/dmaengine.h.
-- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at www.tux.org/lkml/">http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
|